Tag: music blog

  • AI Music: Where Are We Now?

    AI Music: Where Are We Now?

    As we make full headway into 2026, AI will undoubtedly be one of the biggest talking points and considerations for most industries, particularly the music industry. In 2023/24, in my undergraduate dissertation, I considered how the presence of AI would impact the music industry. Two years later, I wanted to check in on its progress. Here’s what I found:

    WHAT I PREDICTED IN 2025

    First of all, it was clear that AI had scope to improve rapidly – I saw evidence of this within just a few months. Comparing the uncanny debut music video of the first all-AI singer, Anna Indiana, with her most recent songs, it was clear how much the melodies and musical style had improved (she has now released an album, if you’re interested!). 

    AI singer, Anna Indiana

    Secondly, I predicted that AI used in transparent ways for creative purposes will generally sit more comfortably with people than those trying to mimic humans. As I found with Anna Indiana, there was something eerie about the lack of actual human involvement behind her. Uses for AI, such as the AI Song Contest, where participants experiment and collaborate with AI to create songs, explaining the creative process and the models they used throughout, are much less ambiguous and easier for people to wrap their heads around!  

    AI Song Contest

    I ultimately reached the conclusion that musicians – and everyone, really – should not be afraid of AI. It’s not disappearing any time soon, I’m afraid! In fact, I do think that over time it will become less of a stigma; upon the invention of any new form of technology throughout history, there have been fears and scaremongering about the negative impact that it might have on humanity – whether justified or not – and yet nowadays we don’t think twice about using them in our daily lives, such as the computer, or devices that can play music. Also, as we will see, AI can be used for some really cool things! We should harness it the best we can, or at least be open-minded enough to explore it, so as not to be left behind.

    WHERE IS AI NOW?

    AI Artists

    AI artists have been taken to a new level since Anna Indiana. There have been a flurry of AI artists appearing on the scene, including the R&B-style Xania Monet and the Country-style Breaking Rust, both of which made it onto various charts. Other AI-generated songs have also gained traction, such as ‘We Are Charlie Kirk’ by Spalexma, which reached number 1 on Spotify’s Viral 50 songs chart for the USA and globally, and ‘A Million Colors’ by Vinih Pray broke onto TikTok’s Viral 50 chart.   

    AI singer, Xania Monet.
    AI singer, Breaking Rust

    Could this be the future of music? I’m not convinced. Rather than people’s actual fondness of the tracks, it is more likely the novelty, hype and debate surrounding AI that has attracted such attention to these songs. For instance, whilst I do not think these songs are bad as such, just knowing that they have not necessarily been created or performed by actual humans makes me feel slightly sceptical about them, whether subconsciously or not. In fact, a study by the global music streaming platform, Deezer (2025), showed that “66% of music streaming users say they would listen to 100% AI-generated music at least once, out of curiosity,” but that “45% of music streaming users would like to filter out 100% AI-generated music from their music streaming platform.” 

    Deezer has also flagged an issue; their AI detection software found that 50,000 AI songs are uploaded to the streaming platform daily, 34% of total uploads (ibid.). They also found that 97% of listeners in their study could not recognise if a track was AI. Not only does this highlight the importance of transparently labelling tracks, i.e. being clearly tagged as AI, but it also has major implications for the distribution of royalties, as we will see.

    Legal Implications

    One area which I didn’t cover in my dissertation, but which is a vast and complex issue, is the web of legal implications AI creates for the music industry, issues that are only going to multiply as AI gains even more traction. I can only hope to skim the surface here. 

    As touched on above, the influx of AI songs onto streaming platforms means new structures must be constructed to calculate royalties, such as including detection systems to determine which songs are AI-created, and to what extent. Otherwise, the risk stands that spam AI tracks posing as human artists eat into the royalties otherwise earned by human artists.

    Another issue that has caused major legal disputes in the industry is how AI is trained. AI learns from existing material that it finds/is fed, and, unsurprisingly, not all artists are too happy with their music being used to train AI without their consent. This has recently led to the controversy surrounding the track ‘I RUN’ by HAVEN. Released in October 2025 by British producers Harrison Walker and Jacob Donaghue, it used AI-generated vocals. What caught people’s attention was that these vocals sounded like the popular British singer, Jorja Smith, so much so that the track was taken down from Spotify, TikTok and the Billboard charts over allegations of impersonation. The track has now been re-released with the human singer Kaitlin Aragon. 

    ‘I Run’ by HAVEN
    British singer, Jorja Smith.

    Whether or not the AI used was indeed trained on Smith’s vocals remains unknown, but it poses significant implications for the use of AI in tracks and the legal frameworks surrounding it. For example, major labels such as UMG and Warner have signed deals with the AI music generators Suno and Udio to prevent the use of stolen work, which the labels have already accused Suno and Udio of doing.

    It is unclear how many more major changes to the legal landscape of the industry will be made in the coming years with the increasing prominence of AI, but it is clear that there will be many. It is evident to me that emphasis must be put on maintaining maximum fairness for human artists, including the distribution of fair royalties and requiring full consent before their music or vocals are used to train AI. I also believe that full transparency should be required in terms of how a song is created, i.e. to what extent AI has been used, so listeners have full awareness of the nature of the music they are listening to.

    Used as a tool

    Once it is established how AI can be used in a legal and fair way, it becomes apparent that its capabilities as a tool for musicians are vast and becoming increasingly advanced. Its ability to create new melodies and lyrics, for example, could be used as inspiration; various AI programmes such as LANDR and iZotope allow users to mix and master their tracks from their laptops; and album artwork could be generated using AI image generators. Ultimately, AI allows various aspects of creating and releasing music to be more accessible. 

    While this understandably leads to concerns over the replacement of human jobs, which is a very real possibility and is already beginning to occur, I believe the best way to stay afloat is to learn how to use AI to our benefit. The rate at which AI is progressing is unlikely to slow down, and so to put it bluntly, we must not get left behind!

    A couple of artists in particular have demonstrated just some of the possibilities that AI affords, namely, Grimes, who has agreed to split 50% of the royalties with anyone who creates a successful track using her voice, promoting the “idea of open sourcing all art and killing copyright” (cited in Savage, 2023). Similarly, Holly Herndon created an AI model called Holly+, which allows users to create music using her voice. 

    Canadian musician, Grimes
    Holly Herndon, Holly+

    There is also evidence that listeners still value genuine human experiences and emotions, something that AI might be able to mimic, but will never be able to feel for itself. I believe this will be a major drawback for AI music. Music is one of the most personal and subjective human phenomena, and to take away this wonderful aspect of the art form would greatly diminish its power. I would argue, therefore, that human-created music will continue to prevail, at least in the meantime. Olivia Dean’s explanation of the truth behind her lyrics summarises this perfectly:

    When it comes to music, then, I believe that as long as fair legal frameworks are in place, AI can be used as a tool, but due to the fact that many people value genuine experiences and feelings feeding into the music they hear (which has been the case throughout history), there is no immediate risk that AI music will replace human music.

    CONCLUSION

    Comparing AI’s current position in and impact on the music industry with 2-3 years ago shows that its capabilities, as expected, have continued to improve, and it is gaining increasing traction, with songs by AI artists actually making it into the charts – Anna Indiana would be proud! However, there is still controversy around AI being used to sound like a human, as seen with ‘I Run’, and it seems that people still put great value on music being injected with genuine human experiences, something that AI simply cannot achieve. Hence, I do not believe that AI music will overtake human music any time soon. At least when it comes to music, then, I see no current risk in at least experimenting with AI and learning how to use it to our advantage, rather than being fearful of it. We must, however, ensure that it is used in a transparent and fair way, being mindful of its legal implications.

    These are exciting times, and it will be fascinating to continue watching how AI will develop and how the industry will adapt!

    Deezer (2025) Deezer/Ipsos survey: 97% of people can’t tell the difference between fully AI-generated and human made music – clear desire for transparency and fairness for artists. https://newsroom-deezer.com/2025/11/deezer-ipsos-survey-ai-music/ (Accessed 30 Jan 2026).

    Savage, M. (2023) Grimes says anyone can use her voice for AI-generated songs. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-65385382 (Accessed 31 Jan 2026).

  • Tarren: Pioneering ‘New-Folk’

    Tarren: Pioneering ‘New-Folk’

    Tarren, a talented and exciting folk trio based in Bristol, comprises Sid Goldsmith on cittern and concertina, Alex Garden on fiddle and Danny Pedler on accordion. The group was formed following the sharing of compositions with each other over lockdown, and their repertoire, which mostly features originals, is rooted in English folk music. They have released two studio albums, both of which have received high acclaim. Bright Young Folk, for example, have described how their latest album, Outside Time, “conveys the joyful energy of their live performances and shows why Tarren are one of the most exciting names on the folk scene”.1 The Isle of Man was lucky to have Tarren visit on their Autumn tour around the UK, playing at the Laxey Working Men’s Institute on 24th October 2025. Before they went on stage, I was able to steal a few minutes with them for a quick chat. I was fascinated to learn about their perspectives on genre and how this feeds into their music, as well as the research they have undertaken into notions of gender in the folk tradition. I’m sure you will become as entranced by their music as I was – I must admit I have played them on repeat ever since! 

    Tarren at the Laxey Working Men’s Institute, Oct 2025. Photo: John Barker.

    The concert was unforgettable, and the music was thoroughly gripping. With melodies that ranged from joyous, for example, ‘Claudia’s,’ to those with a melancholy undertone, such as ‘Super 8,’ all created a powerful atmosphere. The strong rhythmic pulse made it impossible not to tap your foot along, emphasised with moments of syncopation, changes in time signature and the occasional replacement of a beat with a rest, which was highly impactful. There was such intensity and life to the playing, which was infectious, and it is difficult to capture the raw emotion and power of the sound they created in words. They were note perfect, and the ensemble was so tight, which, with such intricate music, was impressive. There were many interweaving layers, constant variation in sound and style, and contrasting intensities – for example, suddenly dying away then building up again. The rich and full sound created from just three people was all-encompassing, with each instrument bringing its own unique texture and dimension, such as the heavy bass of the accordion and the intense and hoarse tone of the fiddle when Alex really dug into the strings; each player getting the most out of their instruments. They were engaging and natural with the audience, coming across as down-to-earth and funny, and they detailed the stories behind the songs, many being relatable and relevant to today, as well as tying to their own personal experiences – more on that soon. Overall, the concert was enjoyable in every aspect.

    A unique component of Tarren’s music is their incorporation of classical elements; as they explained to me before the concert, they believe there can be a rub between folk and classical music. They highlighted how

    they have not limited themselves to one genre, but make use of all of the tools available to them.

    Therefore, they do not belong to one specific camp; hence, they call their style ‘New-Folk.’ They use classical techniques and features, for example, longer structural forms, but inject a folk ‘pulse.’ You can also hear minimalist influences, including repeating and overlapping patterns creating a polyphonic texture and mesmerising harmonies which slide deliciously from one chord to the next – listen out for some of these in ‘Dan-Y-Bont’ below.

    I am also reminded of Baroque music, in the way that each line has its own distinct melody and in the clarity of the sound and harmonies.

    As the trio poignantly highlighted,

    you don’t have to get the form to get the music,

    and they demonstrate this perfectly – at the end of the day, it is what resonates with listeners that is important, a sentiment that I fully support.

    I believe this flexible mindset should be adopted broadly. The boundaries between musical genres are becoming increasingly blurred; think, for example, of the use of classical timbres such as strings in popular music, and I think this type of crossover should be encouraged more. For example, despite being inspired to play violin after hearing folk music when I was young – I was obsessed with Riverdance! – as a musician who has been classically trained, I have had little to no exposure to playing folk music or using folk methods, such as playing by ear or in an informal group setting, as is folk tradition. Tarren reminds us that there does not need to be a strict divide drawn between genres and that they can (and should!) have a more fluid relationship.

    Gender in Folk Music

    The trio have done valuable and enlightening research into themes of gender in folk music, and have compellingly adapted traditional songs to align with their own personal experiences and with today’s society. In an article about their research, Danny notes that there are many folk songs, particularly from the 17th and 18th centuries, about ‘warrior women,’ which tell stories of women who disguise themselves as men and subsequently encounter feats they would never ordinarily have faced as a woman, such as entering into battle or acting as highwaymen.2 At face value, these songs might appear as the progressive subversion of gender constraints, but as Danny acknowledges, it is unfortunately not the case. By accomplishing stereotypically ‘manly’ traits such as bravery and virtue, “the woman has excelled at being a man, not broadening what it means to be a woman.” Furthermore, the motivations for these fictional women were usually to follow after a man who had been conscripted, for example, and on their return, they land safely back in their domestic role to fulfil their womanly duties. These songs, in their outrageousness, were merely intended for entertainment, rather than transgressing gender boundaries. 

    Tarren takes such songs, however, and reinterprets them, using them as a way to broaden the traditional conceptions of gender. Their original composition, ‘Neither Maid nor Man,’ does this elegantly. As Danny notes,

    “Folk music is a living tradition; it lives through reinterpretations and additions.”

    Featuring re-written versions of ‘The Female Cabin Boy’ and ‘William Taylor,’ where both female and male gender expectations are subverted, the final verse reflects the journey of Tarren’s own Alex coming out as non-binary. It is a subtle yet highly impactful spin on a historical folk tradition, making it relevant to the 21st century and their own experiences. 

    Tarren are a highly talented trio whose unique interpretation of folk music is utterly captivating. By not confining themselves to a specific genre, they have opened up a range of musical possibilities, as well as reminding us that genre does not have to be so clear-cut. Also, sensitive to the sometimes exclusionary themes of traditional folk songs, they have brought awareness to this and have reinterpreted them to bring them up to date with today’s ever-changing culture and society. Music does not exist in a vacuum – there is no reason that genres cannot be blended, or that traditions cannot be altered to align with the current times.

    1. ‘Press,’ Tarren, https://tarrenmusic.com/press. ↩︎
    2. Pedlar, D., ‘Neither Maid nor Man: Tarren explore gender variance in British Folk song,’ Tradfolk, 2024, https://tradfolk.co/music/songs/gender-variance-folk-song-neither-maid-nor-man/. ↩︎